A Study on Marketing Problems of Kumbar Community of Gadag District.
Netravati Chitragar1, Dr. Lingaraj Niduvani2
1Research Student, Department of Social Work, Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University Gadag, chitragarnetravati109@gmail.com
2Lecturer and Research Guide, Department of Social Work, Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University Gadag, lingarajvn707@gmail.com
Abstract
Pottery, as one of India's oldest traditional arts, involves the creation of vessels and objects using clay and other raw materials. Passed down through generations, this art form faces challenges in marketing for the Kumbar community in Gadag District. Despite government initiatives, potters encounter issues such as low demand, inadequate income, modernization hurdles, skill deficiencies, limited product diversification, and insufficient storage space. This study delves into these challenges and explores the community's traditional marketing practices.
Keywords: Pottery, Kumbar, Traditional Community, Marketing.
Introduction:
Pottery is a demanding art that requires dedication and hard work. The Kumbar community has established its market system, predominantly selling products from their homes. Challenges during marketing include insufficient demand, low income, modernization pressures, skill gaps, limited product diversity, and inadequate storage space. Overcoming the perception of fragility associated with clay products is essential, given the numerous benefits they offer. Despite challenges, regions like Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh continue to use clay products.
Notably, not all pottery products in Gadag are locally made; some are sourced from places like Ranebennur, Kupelur, Belur, Ballari, and others. The diminishing art of pottery in the region is attributed to factors such as a lack of skill, raw materials, technological updates, production space, awareness of government facilities, training for artisans, poor marketing strategies, and financial assistance.
Review Of Literature
Akilandeshwari .S. (2016), “Production and Marketing Strategies of Pottery Artisans and Their Prospects – A Study in Madurai Region”: Akilandeshwari's research in Tamil Nadu focused on the challenges faced by pottery artisans, assessing their entrepreneurial skills. The study highlighted poor knowledge of production and marketing technology among artisans, along with a reluctance to take risks.
Paul Binoy (2022), “Pottery Is a Traditional Art Form of the Barak Valley In Assam, India: A Study”: Binoy's study on the pottery art form in Assam's Barak Valley explored its historical background and observed improvements in pottery marketing. Government and non-government initiatives were identified as contributing to the progress of the craft.
Dash Manjusmita, Mishra Bhushan Bindhu (2021), “Problems of Handicraft Artisans: Overviews”: Dash and Mishra's research in Odisha evaluated the problems faced by handicraft artisans, recommending government support through participation in events, introduction of new products, and the provision of loans.
Objectives of the Study:
Research Methodology
Sampling: A non-random sampling method was employed, selecting participants from various talukas in Gadag District. The sample size of 64 includes Kumbar artisans, stakeholders, and relevant community members.
Data Collection: Primary data was gathered through interviews and surveys, focusing on the marketing experiences, challenges, and aspirations of the Kumbar community. Secondary data from government reports, scholarly articles, and industry publications complemented the primary findings.
Problems faced by the Potters
Addressing these challenges comprehensively is crucial for revitalizing the art of pottery within the community, fostering skill development, providing access to resources, promoting technological integration, and enhancing the overall resilience of the pottery industry.
Table No.1 Age-wise distribution of the artisans
Age |
Number of artisans(N=64) |
Percentage |
18-25 |
2 |
3.1 |
26-35 |
8 |
12.5 |
36-45 |
11 |
17.2 |
46-55 |
15 |
23.4 |
56 years and above |
28 |
43.7 |
The above table shows the age related information of the respondents.18-25 age group accounted for 3.1% of the respondents.12.5% of the respondents were in the age group of 26-35.36-45 age group was 17.2%.23.4% of the respondents were in the age group of 46-55 years and 43.7% of the respondents 56 years and above.
It is analyzed that most of the middle-aged people were involved in the pottery art. Only 12.5% of the adults are interested in the art because their parents don’t want to continue this occupation. Only some of the adults were interested to continue the art.
Table No.2 Education
Education |
Number of Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Illiterate |
33 |
53.1 |
Primary |
20 |
31.3 |
High school |
5 |
7.8 |
PUC |
3 |
4.7 |
Graduate |
1 |
1.6 |
Post graduate |
00 |
00 |
Diploma |
00 |
00 |
Others |
1 |
1.6 |
From the above table we can understand that 53.2% of respondents were Illiterate. The primary (1-7th) and High school (8th-10th) education has been completed by 31.3% and 7.8% of respondents. Very few 4.7% and 1.6% of respondents have completed their PUC and graduation respectively.
It is analyzed that in this community people won’t go for higher education some of them drop out in the middle due to weak economic condition of their family. Government providing educational facilities, some of them is not aware about the facilities and not getting the benefit.
Table No 3 Own Market
Response |
Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Yes |
61 |
95.31 |
No |
03 |
4.68 |
From the above table we notice that 95.3% of the respondents have their own market and only 4.68% of the respondents don’t have their own market. Those who are having own marketing facility they sell their products in their own house. It is analyzed that many people do not have enough space to keep the products in their house. Majority of the people facing this problem, it is important to bring out this condition in front of government to provide space for them for marketing and production.
Table No 4 Current Status of production and marketing
Current status |
Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Increasing |
02 |
3.12 |
Decreasing |
50 |
78.12 |
Moderate |
12 |
18.7 |
From the above table we can conclude that 78.12% of the respondents responded that their occupational status has decreased from earlier (last genaration).3.12% of the respondents responded that the occupational status has increased when compared to last generation and for 18.7 % of the respondents it is moderate they did not find any changes in marketing, It is neutral.
Table No 5. Reason for Decrease of occupational practice as compared to last generation.
Reason |
Number of Responses(N=49) |
Percentage |
Lack of raw materials |
06 |
12.2 |
Low income |
08 |
16.3 |
Lack of skill |
00 |
00 |
No demand |
44 |
89.8 |
Lack of labours |
00 |
00 |
Lack of product diversification |
01 |
2 |
Other |
06 |
12.2 |
Note: Some of them had given more than one response
The above table portrays that majority of the respondents conveyed that introduction of new products such as plastic, gas stove, steel and other alloy utensils has led to decrease in demand of pottery products , unavailability of enough raw materials and lack of marketing has led to irregular flow of income.
Table No 6. Challenges faced by potters while marketing
Challenges |
Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Customer dissatisfaction towards products |
05 |
7.8 |
Lack of place |
13 |
20.3 |
Could not get desired income |
57 |
89.06 |
Quality |
03 |
4.6 |
Note: Some of them had given more than one response
The above table elucidates the challenges faced by the potters while marketing the products. Here 89.06% of respondents say that they could not get desired income due to lack of demand and people do not know the benefits of using the pots and not aware about the effort behind making the products.20.3% of the respondents say that there is no enough place to keep the products , They are facing problems related to place and storage.7.8% of the respondents say that customers are not satisfied with the products and 4.6% of the respondents said that some time they won’t get good quality products.
Table No 7 Satisfaction with Earnings
Response |
Number of Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Yes |
27 |
42.2 |
No |
37 |
57.8 |
From the above table it is observed that 42.2% of the respondents satisfied with their earnings and 57.8% of the respondents not satisfied with their earnings. It is concluded that most of the respondents not satisfied with the earnings because of irregular income.
Table No 8: Earning from the occupation on daily basis
Response |
Number of artisans(N=64) |
Percentage |
1-200 |
42 |
65.6 |
201-400 |
08 |
12.5 |
401-600 |
10 |
15.6 |
601 and above |
04 |
6.3 |
The above table shows that 65.6 % of the respondents earn Rs 1-200on daily basis.15.6 % of the respondents earn Rs 401 -600 daily.12.5% of the respondents earn Rs 201-400 daily and only 6.3 % of the respondents earn Rs 601 and above.
It is concluded that they are not satisfied with their earnings. Enough income is not being generated on daily basis and mostly in the seasonal time sufficient income is generated.
Table No 9. PM Swanidhi Card
Response |
Respondents(N=64) |
Percentage |
Yes |
10 |
15.6 |
No |
54 |
84.4 |
The above table gives information about how many respondents have PM Swanidhi card.84.4% of the respondents do not have PM Swanidhi card and they are not aware of this because they do marketing in their own house and only 15.6% of the respondents have PM Swanidhi card they do marketing in market area.
Findings:
Recommendations:
Suggestions:
These recommendations and suggestions collectively aim to address the multifaceted challenges faced by the Kumbar community in Gadag District, fostering a holistic approach to skill development, resource accessibility, government support, and education for sustainable growth.
Acknowledgment:
I am exremely thankful to our Vice Chancellor Prof.Vishnukanth Chatapalli and Registrar
Prof.Basavaraj Lakkannavar of Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, Garage for providing an opportunity .And I would like to thank our supervisor Dr.Lingaraj Niduvani for their support, guidence, motivation to complete and build confidence and I would like to thank all members of Kumbar Community for providing information and for their support and I also thankful to all faculties and students of MSW Programme for their support and guidance.
References: